The Welt (2013) reports 											currently on practices against migrant Rroma in Hamburg. The responsible 											Minister of the Interior Michael Neumann wants to continue the deportations of 											asylum seekers from South Eastern Europe, despite the massive criticism from 											Greens, the Left and the FDP. This does not mean, according to the Interior 											Minister that the deportations were not individually critically examined. 											Again, one must be amazed that migrants from Southeast Europe are held from the 											outset for Rroma, although this fact is not recorded in the statistics. Many 											immigrants from the Balkans are members of other ethnic groups. However, it is 											true that Rroma are particularly affected by exclusion. Radio Dreyeckland 											(2013) rightly criticised that the protection rate of asylum applications from 											Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Bosnia-Hercegovina fixed at 5% is too low. 											Many Rroma in these countries are discriminated against and should not 											therefore be treated as pure poverty refugees. This is also criticized by 											Jelpke (2013): The asylum applications of immigrants from the Western Balkans 											are being processed in shorter and shorter periods. This is due to the 											coalition agreement between the CDU and the SPD. This document plans to declare 											the western countries of South Eastern Europe to be “safe countries”. This 											makes it increasingly difficult for migrants from these countries to get a 											successful asylum application. A protective claim is still just awarded 0.1 to 											0.6 percent of applicants from Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
The federal states of 											Schleswig-Holstein, Bremen and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, meanwhile decided a 											deportation moratorium for the winter months (Carini 2013).
Haug (2013), in his article, 											points to the discrepancy between integration efforts communicated by the State 											and the real experienced exclusion. Rroma deported to Serbia mostly find there 											an income on the edge of society or live on welfare. Against the official 											statement of Serbia, that Rroma are not persecuted in the country stand in 											contrast to the misery and hopelessness: “Where 											it can be, they are marginalized, the victims reported. You get no jobs and are 											not informed of your rights. Even for food the meagre money barely suffice. 											[…] “On paper, there are now many measures to end discrimination against 											these people,” says the lawyer. The trip did however convinced him that: 											“In daily life the affected ones feel little of it””
The President of the German 											Association of Cities Ulrich Maly goes against simple explanations in 											connection with immigrants from Southeast Europe. The migrants are often 											discriminated against and are hoping for a better life in Germany. He appealed 											to the historical responsibility of Germany in dealing with minorities and 											argued against a policy of isolation, as demanded by several parties. Rather, 											one must promote the integration in Germany and in the countries of origin: “These are not people who come and go with 											open hands to the administration. They come for other reasons. Because they are 											oppressed at home, perhaps even feel persecuted. They come because they believe 											that they will find a better life with us. These are reasons that one initially 											must respect.” Maly therefore goes against an alliance of politicians and 											citizens fearing a “social tourism” on the German social welfare system from 											the beginning of 2014. Bulgarians and Romanians will then be able to search 											unrestricted fro work in the European Union, thanks to the European free 											Movement Agreement (Kusicke 2013).
Leber (2013) sees the debate 											about immigration marked by varying degrees of coverage in social systems. The 											“general principle of European free movement” meets various forms of social 											welfare. That, however, this is not necessarily a contradiction in a polemical 											debate, however, it is often forgotten. Instead, it is dominated by a politics 											of fear, which flattens the heterogeneity of migration phenomena and 											propagandises the immigration of unskilled problem cases. It is this 											utilitarian thinking is criticized by Koch (2013) in his account of the 											problem. It means a ranking of people on questionable, inhuman principles.