Leghtas 																						(2013) reflects on the rising evictions of informal Rroma camps in France that 																						recur every summer. In March 2012, François Holland, then still a presidential 																						candidate, blamed the policies of the Sarkozy administration for the blatant 																						poverty of the Rroma in France. It was a scapegoat policy taking place on the 																						back of Rroma and additionally stigmatizing them. But even under the new Hollande 																						government, Leghtas emphasizes that things have not changed in practice. The 																						much-quoted circular of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of August, 2012, which 																						calls for a better information policy to residents and for the timely 																						organization of alternative accommodation had not been applied very often. A 																						law that was passed under Sarkozy and allows the deportation of Romanian and 																						Bulgarian Rroma for “abuse” of the European freedom of travel is still in 																						force. Some mayors have themselves taken the initiative and organised legal 																						accommodation for he needy and enrolled the children into classes. These 																						individual acts – so Leghtas – do not free the French government of its 																						responsibility for finding a respectable, long-term solution in dealing with 																						Rroma. France must follow a politic in agreement with the UN human rights 																						policies that guarantee a timely relocation and care of those affected by 																						forced evictions. In addition, the French government has to seek better 																						integration policies, such as reducing barriers in accessing the labour market. 																						In August, a new wave of evictions is imminent. It is time for the government 																						Hollande to put their new orientation towards the Sarkozy administration to the 																						test.
Various 																						French newspapers (Bertrand, 2013, Dessus, 2013, Le Point, 2013) also report 																						back on the prosecution of Jean-Marie Le Pen and Christian Estrosi for racist 																						abuse against Rroma. The European Forum of Rroma, SOS Rasismus and the 																						Association of French Rroma organizations are the accusers. The plaintiffs accuse 																						Le Pen and Estrosi among others, to promote a discourse of hatred against the 																						Rroma purely for electoral purposes. Various newspapers equate Rroma with 																						Travellers, even though most Rroma are recognized to be sedentary. The Mayor 																						Sophie Dessus advocates a cooperative deal with the residents of illegal 																						settlements, rather than collection of repressive policies. Le Creurer (2013) 																						summarizes the statements of Estrosi as follows: “Monsieur Estrosi a 																						tenu des propos xénophobes contre les gens du voyage suite à des occupations 																						illégales de terrains communaux par leurs caravanes. Il a dénoncé des 																						comportements de „délinquants“ et a appelé les maires de France à „la révolté“ 																						en proposant de leur fournir son „mode d’emploi“ pour „les mater.““  [Mister Estrosi made 																						xenophobic statements against travellers following illegal occupations of 																						communal land by their caravans. He denounced what he deemed “criminal” 																						behaviours, and appealed to France’s Mayors to “revolt” offering them his “how 																						to” to tame them.] Due 																						to existing regulations, all communities are asked to provide space for at 																						least 50 caravans and transit sites for 50 to 250 caravans (Polloni 2013). In 																						this case Rroma are again confused travellers. Only a small single-digit 																						percentage of Rroma is effectively travelling.
Ziegler 																						(2013) addresses the now frequently encountered confusion between the terms of Rroma, 																						Gypsies and Travellers. Louis de Gouyon Matignon, junior president of the 																						French Association for the gypsy culture suggests the following distinction: “Il est très important de faire la distinction. Le peuple tsigane est 																						formé de trois peuples différents : les Roms lorsqu’ils sont à l’Est de 																						l’Europe, les manouches lorsqu’ils sont à l’Ouest, et enfin les gitans 																						lorsqu’ils sont sur la péninsule ibérique. Les tsiganes de France s’appellent 																						les gens du voyage. Ce sont des citoyens français qui n’ont rien à voir avec 																						les Roms qui sont des citoyens de l’Europe et qui sont pour la majorité, soit 																						Roumains, soit Bulgares.” [It is really important to make 																						a distinction. The Gypsy people comprise three different groups: The Rroma, 																						when they are in Eastern Europe, the Manouches when they are in the West, and 																						the Gitanos, when they are in the Iberic Penninsula. These are French citizen 																						who have nothing to do with the Rroma who are European citizen and who are in 																						majority either Romanian or Bulgarian.] One can only criticise this 																						distinction between Rroma, Manouche, Gipsies and Tsiganes as being simplistic 																						and only partially true. The German Sinti and the closely related French 																						Manouche, as well as the Spanish Kale (Gipsies) are country-specific 																						designations for members of the Rroma who live since the 15th Century in 																						Western Europe. Sinti are part of the Rroma as a whole and not a separate 																						ethnic group. These groups contrasts with Rroma  immigrants from Eastern Europe from the 20th Century who 																						migrated to Western Europe because of civil war or economic hardship.
Polloni 																						(2013) takes a closer look at Christian Estrosi’s Rroma policies. She points 																						out the contradiction that, contrary to the provisions in force, only a fraction 																						of the necessary permanent and transit sites for Travellers  who are incorrectly equated here with 																						the Rroma are available. The article focuses more on the Estrosi’s visit to the 																						Aboras stadion, where Rroma were quartered for several weeks. Estrosi called for 																						the Travellers to immediately leave the stadium. When they refused, Estrosi 																						threatened them with a systematic monitoring of all their activities: “Bon, on va voir, j’en ai maté d’autres et je vous materai. Et la 																						première chose que je fais c’est de mettre des caméras partout, pour surveiller 																						vos faits et gestes dans les quelques heures qui viennent, on va noter ceux qui 																						rentrent, ceux qui sortent, à quelle minute, à quel moment, et ce que vous 																						allez faire partout dans la ville, dans la métropole, etc.“ [So, let’s see, I 																						tamed others and will tame you. And the first thing I will do is put cameras 																						everywhere, to watch everything you do in the few hours from now, we will note 																						who came in, went out, at which minute, at what time, and what you are going to 																						to everywhere in the city, the agglomeration, etc.] With this rigorous monitoring policy Estrosi 																						wants to force these “stateless” people to a state compliant behaviour.
France 3 																						(2013) discusses the state of Romanian, Bulgarian and Spanish Rroma immigrants 																						in Auvergne. The immigrants are in a state of non-appurtenance: Although they are EU 																						citizens, they are not welcome just about anywhere and it is therefore very difficult 																						to build a livelihood and to integrate.
Sources:
- Bertrand, Yann (2013) Roms : trois associations 																						portent plainte contre Estrosi et Le Pen. In: France Info online vom 17.7.2013.
 
- Dessus, Sophie (2013) Estrosi et les gens du 																						voyage: maire PS, j’ai aussi des soucis mais pas les mêmes méthodes. In: Le Plus online vom 17.7.2013. 
 
- France 3 (2013) En Auvergne aussi, les Roms sont 																						confrontés à de graves situations d’exclusion. In: France 3 online vom 																						11.7.2013.
 
- Leghtas, Izza (2013) „L’été 2013 sera-t-il différent pour les Roms en 																						France?” In: L’express France online 																						vom 16.7.2013.  
 
- Le Creurer, 																						Olivier (2013) Le Forum européen des Roms et des Gens du voyage porte plainte 																						contre Jean-Marie Le Pen et Christian Estrosi. In: France 3 online vom 18.7.2013.
 
- Le Point 																						(2013) Gens du voyage : plainte contre Estrosi et Le Pen. In: Le Point online vom 17.7.2013.
 
- Polloni, 																						Camille (2013) Roms et gens du voyage : Christian Estrosi s’emmêle les 																						pinceaux. In: Rue 89 online vom 																						7.7.2013.
 
- Ziegler, 																						Marlène (2013) Gens du voyage : Roms, gitans, tsiganes, qui sont-ils vraiment? 																						In: La Toile de fond (Mlactu) online vom 17.7.2013.