The latest article of 																						the Weltwoche by Alex Reichmuth 																						(2014) claims a feud between Swiss Yeniche and foreign, travelling Rroma. However, 																						Reichmuth argues with such absurd evidence that he actually refutes himself. At 																						the beginning of the article, he states: “The 																						camp Augsterich in Kaiseraugst, Aargau, is hidden between a main road and the 																						railway line. […] Behind bushes there is a small gravel area: the so-called cleansing 																						place. Here, foreign travellers, who because for cultural reasons don’t use 																						toilets, do their businesses. […] Augsterich is the only place in Aarau, which 																						is open to foreign travellers. In the summer, it is mainly used by French Roma, 																						who usually stay for a few days or weeks. […] With the place, it was intended 																						to prevent the chronic wild camping by foreign travellers in the lower Frick 																						Valley, and related problems such as waste and faeces.” Reichmuth applies a 																						highly reductionist reasoning, by presenting the foreign, travelling Rroma as a 																						wild horde. To ascribe them a cultural alterity that prohibits the use of 																						toilets, due to individual extreme cases, is totally absurd. Hygiene, on the 																						very opposite, has a very high priority among Rroma, as it is reflected in the 																						tradition of ritual purity. Most Rroma, as Reichmuth also states for the 																						Yeniche, are not travelleres. By repeatedly talking of asocial, unhygienic 																						Rroma, the article conveys the impression that this is a cultural feature of 																						the Rroma, what is false and racist. In addition, the terms “foreign 																						travellers” and “Roma” are largely used interchangeably. The enemy stereotype 																						is also confirmed by the interviewed Yeniche: “The social control works. But it upsets them that the population does 																						not distinguish between Swiss and foreign travellers. Fatal for their 																						reputation was a Roma wedding in the Lower Valais two years ago, says one of 																						the Yeniche. At that time, about 400 foreign travellers illegally occupied a 																						field, threatened the landowner with death and left a terrain strewn with 																						garbage and faeces.” Foreign travellers are also held responsible for the hesitant 																						creation of new camping places, because reservations under of the local 																						population are said to be large. In places where only domestic travellers stop, 																						as in the canton of Aargau, extensions and new camps are said to be much easier 																						to realise. Jörg Hartmann, from the building department of Aargau, supports 																						this racist view. More eyewitnesses are cited to document the bad experiences with 																						foreign, travelling Rroma. These experiences interpret single events in an 																						ethnic and racist context. In addition, they automatically take for granted the 																						suspicious fact that the foreign travellers are Rroma. How they identify the 																						ethnicity remains unclear.
Reichmuth takes a 																						completely different viewpoint. Authorities as lobbyists are accused of 																						sugarcoating and moralizing the real problems, as is Stéphane Laederich, director 																						of the Rroma Foundation: “Think about 																						whether you really need to wirte “Roma” each time, recommended Stéphane 																						Laederich […] in a journalists magazine”, or whether it would be possible, 																						for example, to denote people as Romanians or Hungarians.” Reichmuth 																						interprets this recommendation as an invitation to cover up nuisances. Rather, 																						Laederich wants to protect the reputation of the majority of the Rroma, who are 																						living integrated and unobtrusively in Switzerland. This invisible Rroma are 																						denied their existence by the Weltwoche. 																						Instead, it presents a minority of problem cases as general cases and requires 																						a rigorous implementation of the mass immigration initiative for foreign travellers, 																						what is said to help the Swiss travellers.
The issue is addressed more 																						diplomatically in the Tagesanzeiger. 																						There, representatives of the new Yeniche protest movement “Movement of Swiss Travelers” 																						have their say. These emphasize that the distinction between Yeniche and 																						foreign Rroma is important for their reputation, because the views of their 																						minority has declined in recent time: “While 																						the Swiss travellers use chemical toilets and showers in their caravans, the 																						foreign travellers prefer a meadow for their business. “We do not want to be 																						racist”, says [Silvan] Waser. But the Roma, who travel through Switzerland in 																						large groups of cars and leave the places in a mess, harm the image of the 																						Swiss travellers. “We are tired of being responsible for something which we did 																						not do.” A minority who argues against another minority, that’s disconcerting. 																						And not all are of the opinion that one should do this. “The Roma are travellers 																						like us, they have wives and children and are looking for places to stay” say 																						some women later” (Schmid 2014). The biased distinction between integrated Yeniche 																						and asocial, foreign Rroma can be found in numerous other articles. They also spread 																						prejudiced knowledge as objective facts or point to this very fallacy (compare Ferraro 																						2014, Fuchs 2014, Jecker 2014, 																						Waldmeier 2014, Wanner 2014).