On September the 19th, 											the decision as to whether Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina will be 											declared safe countries of origin on part of Germany will be made. The debate 											about the security against persecution and discrimination in the three states 											is discussed especially in reference to the fate of the Rroma. In this regard, 											there are major disagreements whether and how Rroma are exposed to 											discrimination. While the proponents of the new law assume that the Rroma are 											indeed affected by poverty in the three countries, they claim that they are 											free of persecution. Just the opposite is stated by many refugee and asylum 											organizations, and also by the central council of German Sinti and Roma. These 											different views concerning the security situation of minorities in Serbia, 											Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina reveal that the assessment of marginalization 											and discrimination are based on very different criteria: supporters of a poor 											security situation refer to meaningful individual cases of discrimination – famous 											are cases that proof the difficult access to health care and other 											institutions, or show the harassment by government officials: “Already now, the reasons people have to 											flee from Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are examined too superficially, 											criticises the Frankfurt lawyer Reinhard Marx. […] Especially [application 											from] Roma of the Western Balkan countries are already now mostly rejected without 											detailed examination “as manifestly unfounded”, the lawyer says. He tells of 											hearing reports and decisions of the branch offices of the BAMF [Federal Office 											for Migration and Refugees]. Refugees have reported “racist assaults, attempted 											rape of girls and suchlike.” “In reasoning of the refusal, this was not 											addressed all”, says the lawyer, the reasons for flight are not carefully 											examined, “which for me is no longer the rule of law” (Grunau 2014). In 											contrast, the proponents of the new law refer to the recognition of the Rroma 											by the political establishment of the countries, the appreciation of Rromanes, 											and the historical evidence in all strata of society of the integration of the 											minority, especially in the countries of former Yugoslavia. Ottoman tax 											registers proof this already for the 15th century, where Rroma are listed as lawyers, 											doctors and policemen (Rroma Foundation 2002). This integration does not mean 											that there is no discrimination since 1989, through the strong growth of nationalism 											in the countries of South Eastern Europe. Again, different evaluation criteria are 											applied: according to the proponents of the new law, there is discrimination 											but no systematic persecution. How can one accurately measured and assess the 											severity of discrimination? In Bosnia-Herzegovina, because of the Dayton 											Agreement, there is only a constitutional protection of Bosnians, Serbs or 											Croats, but no official recognition of other minorities. But this does not mean 											that minorities such as Rroma are not discriminated against in everyday life, the 											critics claim. The different opinions reveal that the knowledge about Rroma is 											still dominated by a lot of uncertainties and gaps in knowledge, and that the discrimination 											of a minority in various countries is anything but easily to determine. 											Therefore, in doubt, the individual experience of discrimination should always 											be favoured over a general assessment of the security situation. One owes that 											to persons who indeed suffer of discrimination. – Neues Deutschland (2014) 											reports that the stricter asylum law is being adopted because of the approval by 											the red-green government of Baden-Württemberg. The Green minister president of 											Baden-Württemberg, Winfried Kretschmann, is now criticised because of his 											decision in his own party. Other German daily newspapers confirm the decision: 											Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are now safe countries of origin from 											Germany’s viewpoint. This means that asylum applications from these countries 											will be handled in an expedited fashion in the future and that discrimination will 											no longer be recognised as a reason for asylum (compare Brey 2014, 											Deringer/Lierheimer 2014, Frenzel 2014, Handelsblatt 2014, Lang 2014, 											Mappes-Niediek 2014, MDR 2014, Möhle 2014, Scholz 2014, Wallraff 2014, Wölfl 											2014).
- Brey, Thomas (2014) Vom Leben der Verzweifelten. In: 											Saarbrücker Zeitung online vom 											19.9.2014. http://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/nachrichten/themen/Belgrad-Asylantraege-Bosnien-Herzegovina-Fluechtlinge-Gesetze-und-Rechtsnormen-Mazedonien-Minderheiten-Regierungseinrichtungen-der-Bundesrepublik-Deutschland-Roma-Serbien-Yugoslawien;art2825,5439289 
- Deringer, Jessica/Lierheimer, Ingo (2014) Was ist 											ein sicheres Herkunftsland? In: Bayerischer 											Rundfunk online vom 18.9.2014. http://www.br.de/nachrichten/asyl-fluechtlinge-sichere-herkunftslaender-100.html
- Frenzel, Korbinian (2014) Grünen-Politikerin gegen 											Änderung des Asylrechts. In: Deutschlandradio 											Kultur online vom 19.9.2014. http://www.deutschlandradiokultur.de/westliche-balkan-staaten-gruenen-politikerin-gegen.1008.de.html?dram:article_id=297956
- Grunau, Andrea (2014) Asylstreit über sichere 											Herkunftsländer. In: Deutsche Welle 											online vom 18.9.2014. http://www.dw.de/asylstreit-über-sichere-herkunftsländer/a-17932403
- Handelsblatt (2014) Grünen-Ja ermöglicht Reform des 											Asylrechts. In: Handelsblatt online 											vom 19.9.2014. http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/kretschmann-stuetzt-bundesregierung-gruenen-ja-ermoeglicht-reform-des-asylrechts/10726530.html 
- Lang, Alexander (2014) “Roma zurückzuschicken, das 											geht gar nicht”. In: MiGAZIN online 											vom 19.9.2014. http://www.migazin.de/2014/09/19/roma-zurueckzuschicken-das-geht-gar-nicht/
- – Mappes-Niediek, 											Norbert (2014) Verfolgt werden die Roma nicht – aber sie verarmen. In: Badische Zeitung online vom 19.9.2014. http://www.badische-zeitung.de/kommentare-1/verfolgt-werden-die-roma-nicht-aber-sie-verarmen–91009204.html
- MDR (2014) Bundesrat billigt Änderung beim Asylrecht. 											In: MDR online vom 19.9.2014. http://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/bundesrat-asylrecht100.html
- Möhle, Holger (2014) Bundesrat soll drei 											Balkanstaaten als sicher einstufen. In: General-Anzeiger 											online vom 19.9.2014. http://www.general-anzeiger-bonn.de/news/politik/national/Bundesrat-soll-drei-Balkanstaaten-als-sicher-einstufen-article1454887.html
- Neues Deutschland (2014) Grüne verschärfen 											Asylrecht. In: Neues Deutschland online 											vom 19.9.2014. http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/946466.gruene-verschaerfen-asylrecht.html
- Rroma Foundation (2002) The Situation of Rroma in 											Former Yugolsavia. In: Rroma Foundation 											online vom 28.10.2002. https://rroma.org/reports/reports-nav/the-situation-of-rroma-in.html
- Scholz, Kay-Alexander (2014) Kommt die Asyl-Reform? 											In: Deutsche Welle online vom 											18.9.2014. http://www.dw.de/kommt-die-asyl-reform/a-17927824  
- Wallraff, Lukas (2014) Gute Menschen, schlechte 											Menschen. In: Die Tageszeitung (TAZ) 											online vom 18.9.2014. http://www.taz.de/Kommentar-Sichere-Herkunftslaender/!146109/
- Wölfl, Adelheid (2014) Sind das wirklich sichere 											Herkunftsländer? In: Der Tagesspiegel 											online vom 18.9.2014. http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/serbien-mazedonien-bosnien-herzegowina-sind-das-wirklich-sichere-herkunftslaender/10722818.html