Lazerges (2013) does 											not want to cast the informal Rroma settlements and their evictions as a 											cultural problem, as many French politicians do, but as a problem of poverty. Lazerges 											criticises that there is not enough affordable housing for people with low to 											very low income. Although the eviction of illegal settlements are usually 											lawful, because the houses were built without a permit, they violate the right 											to housing, a due to every human being. In addition, the barriers to access 											education, health care and social protection are still very high, rendering a 											successful integration of Rroma more difficult, “Mais la levée seulement 											partielle des mesures transitoires applicables aux citoyens roumains et 											bulgares est inacceptable et préjudiciable à leur insertion. Nous souhaitons 											la levée immédiate et complète des mesures transitoires, afin de permettre notamment 											aux personnes roms de trouver un emploi, pierre angulaire de l’insertion” 											[The partial removal of transitory measures applicable to Romanian and 											Bulgarian citizen is unacceptable and constitutes a prejudice against their 											integration. We wish the immediate and complete removal of these transitory 											measures to allow, among others the Rroma, to find work, a keystone for their 											insertion.] Lazerges 											further calls for a clear distancing from the defamatory statements made by 											some French politicians that are clearly influenced by the impending Municipal 											elections. On should much more strive for a clear commitment to a real policy 											was that promotes the integration of the Rroma.
Leroy 											(2013) reports on Rroma families in Le Havre, who, with the assistance of the 											collective  “Hébergement, l’urgence 											c’est maintenant” are 											being granted accommodation in various communes. Although families are being 											fragmented, the 64 Rroma, including 44 children, according to Leroy, are rather 											cheering this. On the 16th of July, the families were evicted from 											their camp, a plot of the fire brigade of the Eure and had then settled behind 											the Church of Saint-Augustin.
Piquemal 											(2013) spoke with Alain Régnier, the person responsible for the access to 											housing for the homeless or poorly lodged people (Délégation interministérielle à l’hébergement et à 											l’accès au logement des personnes sans abri ou mal logés; DIHAL). Régnier looking at the politics 											under Nicolas Sarkozy who applied an extreme security policy towards Rroma, sees 											a shift towards more constructive approaches. While the inter-ministerial 											letter from Jean-Marc Ayrault is still far from being applied in its effective 											principles, it is nevertheless getting some movement. Régnier argues for a 											differentiated policy towards the Romanian and Bulgarian Rroma in France: 											Firstly, one must promote successful integration which improves the often very 											poor French skills which would facilitate access to education and housing; and on 											the other hand one has to promote an intelligent, bilateral policy with Romania 											towards their integration at home itself and also in support of a possible 											return. He does not see the difficult access to the labour market as the major cause 											for the lack of integration. In addition, the French population must be better 											informed about the history and culture of the Rroma. Régnier still sees to many 											common misconceptions: many still do not know that there is a difference 											between the “Gens du voyage” and the Rroma. An important part of his 											job is to deconstruct stereotypes and prejudices and counteract.
Mamère 											(2013) criticizes the French Rroma policies as being openly racist: both the 											right and the left parties are, with regards to their treatment of Rroma, very 											restrictive and undifferentiated. While with right-wing politicians like 											Jean-Marie Le Pen, Bourdouleix or Christian Estrosi racial prejudice prevails, 											leading to a denial of individual differences and a stigmatisation of the Rroma 											population that needs to be disciplined or expelled, politicians of the left as 											Manuel Valls are driven by a zealous planning policy, which led the Hollande government 											to an approximate doubling of forced evictions: “Sous 											prétexte de faire respecter l’Etat de droit, il [Manuel Valls] présente les 											camps de Roms comme des zones de non-droit […] En utilisant la justice 											comme arme de sa politique à deux vitesses, il installe dans l’opinion de la 											gauche et des démocrates l’idée que les Roms sont une catégorie de la 											population à mettre au ban de la société.” [Under 											the pretext to enforce the respect of the rights, he [Manuel Valls] presents 											the Rroma camps like zones without laws. … Using justice as a weapon for his 											two speed policies, he instils in the opinion of the left and of the democrats 											the idea that Rroma are a population category that needs to be banned from 											society.] For Mamère, Rroma are instrumentalised by many politicians, 											whether from the right or from left, for purposes of policy: They propagate the 											incompatibility of Rroma life with that of the French. He regards these 											policies as a historical repetition of past practices of exclusion, especially 											the stigmatization of Jews from the Middle Ages to the twentieth century. Until 											1969, the Rroma in France had to carry an anthropometric passport with them. Tthe 											task of politicians is precisely to allow and ensure the coexistence of 											different ways of life, and not to suppress it. To this plea of Mamère we fully 											agree. However, he involuntarily presents cultural difference between Rroma and 											French, where almost none actually exists: He speaks almost continuously of Rroma 											as travellers, whereas most of them are not. The French “Gens du voyage” are 											usually French citizen who do not speak Rromanes.
Hugues 											(2013) describes the French Rroma policies as a disgrace for a country that 											sees itself as the cradle of human rights. In recent years, French policies 											towards Rroma were repeatedly condemned as inhumane by both the UN and the EU. 											France must seek a rapid paradigm shift, if it does not want to lose its legacy 											of tolerance. At the end of July 2013, there have been physical attacks on 											Rroma in which several were seriously injured. The targeted surveillance policies 											advocated by Estrosi are another step backwards in the effort towards more 											tolerance and integration as an alternative to repression and expulsion.
Duquesne 											(2013) also sees the French population policies towards Rroma as increasingly 											aggressive. At the end of July, two residents of a Rroma camp were seriously 											injured in an attack by an armed mob of fifteen people in Saint-Denis. The 											numbers of evictions increase, Estrosi and like-minded want to prevent the 											accession of Romania and Bulgaria into the Schengen area, which would result in 											the freedom of movement with the rest of the EU.
Abdul (2013) reportes on 											a dispute over water in Wissous, in the Essonne department. The Mayor of 											Wissous, Régis Roy Chevalier, on 6 July 2013, turned off  three of five hydrants that are close to 											a Rroma camp.. This after the inhabitants of the camp had tapped the hydrants 											due to lack of a water supply. Thereupon ensued a debate around the question as 											to whether, in the case of lack of water supply water may be illegally tapped. 											While green politicians like Marie-Hélène Brelaud describe Roy Chevaliers 											approach as obscene,  the Social 											Democrat decidedly does not want to be seen as a sympathizer of right-wing 											politicians. He sees himself as a representative of the residents of Wissous 											and whose will he enforces by the means of law: “M. 											Roy-Chevalier, le maire de Wissous, souhaite „se différencier de toutes ces 											personnes“. A l’en croire, cette décision ne relève pas de son autorité de 											maire, mais de celle de la communauté d’agglomération, dont il est 											vice-président… „Mon premier parti, c’est Wissous. Je sais que certains 											partis bien-pensants estiment que l’on peut s’occuper des populations en 											situation illégale avant les autres. Pas moi“, se défend M. Roy-Chevalier.” [ 											M. Roy Chevalier, Wissous’ mayor wishes “to differenciate himself from all 											these people”. If he is to be believed, this decision is not a consequence of 											his mayor’ office, but is the responsibility of the community of agglomeration 											of which he is the vice-president… “My first party, is Wissous. I know that 											certain politically correct parties think that one should take care of illegal 											population first, I don’t”.] 											With this statement, Chevalier cuts himself away from a humanism that is ready 											to break the rules when it is for the better of those concerned.
Fouteau 											(2013) interviewed the French ethnologist Michel Agier, on the question of the 											relationship between ethnicity and nationalism. Agier sees France policies 											toward Rroma as part of a state policy that deliberately defines itself in 											contrast to outsiders, and these outsiders – the Rroma – are consciously 											exploited for one’s own identity definition. In addition, from the perspective 											of the nation state, the state’s borders are strengthened by the assignment of 											clear categories to various population groups. He describes this assignment of 											clear categories as a dominant act that intentionally generates distance and provides 											the justification for eventual the deprivation of rights: “Dans le contexte de la mondialisation, les Roms, ou plutôt ceux qui sont 											désignés comme tels, sont utiles au pouvoir. Au moment où les États-nations 											périclitent, où la crise économique fragilise les sociétés “occidentales”, les 											gouvernants ont besoin de ce nom pour créer un dehors. Ils ont besoin de faire 											croire à leur altérité absolue, de les constituer en étranger ennemi, pour 											faire exister leurs frontières. Expulser des Roms est une manière de produire 											de la nationalité, tout comme expulser des Afghans ou reconduire à la frontière 											des migrants venus d’Afrique.” [In the context of 											mondialisation, the Rroma, or rather those who are thus labelled, are useful to 											the power in place. At a time where nation-states are collapsing, where the 											economical crisis fragilises occidental societies, the rulers need this name to 											create an outside. The need to make believe in their absolute otherness, to 											constitute them as foreign foes in other to make their own borders exist. To 											expulse Rroma is a way to create nationality, exactly as is the expulsion of 											Afghans or to send back migrants from Africa.] However Agiers analysis does 											not go far enough, as he considers Rroma only in terms of methodological 											nationalism. But Klaus-Michael Bogdal has shown in his detailed deconstruction 											of stereotypes and prejudices against Rroma that these are not a phenomenon of 											individual nation-states, but a problem of Europe as a whole. But Agier is 											correct in that it is at the level of national policies that attention these 											categories exists.
Sources:
- Abdul, 											Shahzad (2013) A Wissous, la “chasse à l’eau” des Roms, privés de 											bornes à incendie par le maire. In: Le 											Monde online vom 29.7.2013.
- Duquesne, Pierre (2013) Roms: «Partout, les agressions se multiplient» In: L’Humanité online vom 30.7.2013.
- Fouteau, Caroline (2013) “Expulser 											des Roms est une manière de produire de la nationalité” In: Mille Babords 											online vom 1.8.2013.
- Hugues (2013) Roms : La France qui fait honte au pays des droits de l’homme! 											In: Agora Vox online vom 2.8.2013.
- Lazerges, Christine (2013) Intégrer les Roms requiert du courage politique, 											In: Le Monde online vom 31.7.2013.
- Leroy, Vanessa (2013) Les Roms relogés dans l’agglomération du Havre. In: Paris-Normandie online vom 2.8.2013.
- Mamère, Noël (2013) Les Roms ou la nouvelle question juive. In: Rue 89 online 											vom 30.7.2013. 
- Piquemal, Marie (2013) Les tensions envers les Roms sont plus vives en France 											qu’ailleurs» In: Libération online vom 30.7.2013.